I’ll
be honest: I don’t like
finding out that I’ve been wrong about something. I don’t like to admit this,
but I feel a little squirmy and uncomfortable when I’m confronted with the
vastness of all the things I don’t know.
Like anyone else, I do try to avoid discomfort whenever possible, which
is why at home I often escape into the simplicity of dog-walks, novel-reading,
and old-movie-watching. It’s just easier to not think too hard. But thank goodness, my curiosity and
desire to learn new things overrides those unfortunate insecurities most of the
time. Being a teacher of young children and their parents (and sometimes of
other teachers) is such an
important responsibility that I know I have to look my insecurities square in
the eye sometimes and push myself to deeper levels of understanding. If you’re
a teacher, you have to keep learning.
While
attending the Co-op Preschool Convention last weekend, I felt the familiar
exhilaration of learning many new and useful ideas or understanding old ideas
in a deeper way. But at the
same time I felt the equally familiar discomfort of wondering if maybe I have
been off-base for a long time on certain long-help beliefs. Fortunately, I’m
finally old enough to understand that this is what learning is all about: being confronted with incongruencies in
your thinking, and forcing yourself to examine alternative ideas.
Throughout
the weekend at the convention, I
also had many confidence-building moments as I heard speakers presenting
some of my most basic and long-held ideas as if they were brand new. It’s always great to have the validity
of your teaching practices re-affirmed by “experts.”
Here
are a few of the things I learned or re-learned this weekend at this excellent
conference. I’ll share some of the
challenging ideas that made me wonder about my own wisdom or lack thereof, as
well as some of the stuff I heard that made me feel like a “great teacher.”
I’ll
start off with the “easy stuff.” From a workshop on outdoor play and learning:
-Outdoor
learning is better.
This
is an easy concept for me to accept, and I always try to set up my curriculum
to reflect this basic premise.
There are more sensory experiences outside, and children thrive on
having a connection with nature.
Children’s brains develop through body movement, which outdoor play
encourages.
-The
Why-Not Rule.
I
know that children are driven to learn through exploration and play. So when a child wants to do something
that you may not have had on your “lesson plan,” ask yourself, “ Why not?” If it doesn’t harm themselves or
others, or mess up the environment or someone’s stuff, it’s probably ok even if
it wasn’t what you had in mind.
These kid-generated activities (such as painting the grass as well as
the paper on the easel, or pouring sand into the water table) are often where
the best learning begins. Of course, limits related to how much time it might
take to clean up, or other adult concerns are perfectly valid at times. Real-life dictates that sometimes we
simply don’t have the time, energy, or patience to allow kids to make a big
mess, even if it’s a “productive” mess. And honestly, kids do learn about
“being civilized” when we put the brakes on their big ideas of painting on the
walls, dumping every toy out of every shelf, etc. But if you don’t have the Why-Not Rule in the back of your
mind, you’re very likely to reflexively say no to some valuable play and
learning that are really not much trouble at all. I’ve been a Why-Not Teacher for a long time, but now I
have some new vocabulary to explain it.
-Anything
that can be done inside can be done outside.
Again, this is already part of my teacher-belief system and
practices. I try to set up a
variety of learning activities outside every day, in addition to the basic
daily sand-and-water play. But hearing this again made me challenge myself to
think of more things we could do outside, with just a little extra set-up: such as an outdoor reading area, maybe
even more outdoor art or sensory activities, or possibly outdoor block play.
-Water,
water, water.
As
the presenter showed photos of infants and toddlers in various outdoor play
scenarios, many of the activities looked very familiar, because they are things
we already do in my classes. I was
gratified to hear the presenter talking about how important it is to let
children work and play with the hose while a trickle of water runs into the
sand. When she mentioned the idea
of allowing the water-source to trickle down from above, I remembered how much
fun my toddlers have when I climb up and attach the hose into the tree branches
above the sandbox, and let the water trickle, drip, or spray. The presenter
confirmed my solid belief that the vast learning that springs from endless
forms of water play is well worth the trouble. Darn- I sure wish some of the
parents I’ve had in my classes who are allergic to messes could have heard this
expert talk about this! I try my best, but sometimes it’s hard to convince
parents that although their children are very sweet, they won’t melt like sugar
if they get a little wet.
-Stuff
I hadn’t thought of, or had forgotten.
By
the end of this workshop, I had jotted down a long list of things I wanted to
try at school in the near future.
This list included things such as
wrapping a large tree in big paper, and having kids painting it all the
way around (I did that first thing Monday morning!), an awesome paint-ball-throwing activity which I’d never
heard of, bringing in more largish rocks and stones that can be moved around to
enhance play and construction in my sand area, and helping children build
things with long branches from tree-trimming (Dang- I wish I had thought of
saving the trimmings a few months ago when our playground trees were trimmed!)
-The
Outdoor Classroom.
Using the outdoors as a major part of your classroom
is very basic to my teaching, and to the philosophy behind Explorer’s
curriculum. For more information
about why this is important to us, check out the information at this site:
From
the two major keynote speakers, I learned or re-learned lots of important
concepts related to brain development, emotional development, and how the two
are linked. Some of these ideas
were a bit challenging to me, as I’ll explain:
-Surviving
Tantrums.
Dr.
Tina Bryson discussed how most tantrums are the result of emotional
overload. When children’s
emotional needs build up, the logical reasoning part of the brain becomes
overwhelmed by the more basic, emotional brain regions. The amygdala, responsible for basic
emotions, takes over. Children
cannot be reasoned with in the middle of a big blow-up, but they do need comfort. Adults can help by staying nearby to
give the nonverbal message that the child, along with the child’s big feelings,
are loved and accepted. As soon as
the tantrum begins to wane, the child is usually ready to be hugged and
comforted. This reassurance and support helps create an atmosphere in which the
child will gradually feel less of a need for big explosive tantrums. Over the years, my own approach to
dealing with tantrums has changed and evolved. I agree with Dr. Bryson’s ideas about this, but I haven’t
always thought about it this way.
At a previous point in my understanding, I’m sure that I advised parents
to ignore tantrums, or to let the child cry in their own room. I remember doing this with my own kids,
too. Sorry, girls. I now see how this is much less
on-target in terms of how the brain works and how children develop. So yes, I have to admit that hearing Dr.
Bryson discuss this was a squirmingly uncomfortable moment for me. However, I still hold to one aspect of
my old, less-evolved point of view:
sometimes parents CAN’T stay physically or emotionally present. Real life has taught me that there are
moments when even the best parents can be pushed to a breaking point. If a
parent can’t handle one more moment of the screaming without becoming a
tantruming toddler themselves (don’t tell me you’ve never felt this way!) then
I think it’s best to remove yourself from the tantrum if you can. When it comes to parenting advice,
there’s always the “best case” scenario and the “worst case” scenario.
Sometimes we simply can’t do what the experts advise us to do, so we have to muddle
through the best we can. Certainly:
it makes perfect sense to make every effort to be the strong, dependable
adult who can stay nearby, giving an upset child the important message that
their feelings are accepted, and they are loved no matter what. But when you
can’t, don’t immerse yourself in guilt.
Apologize and try again next time.
Parenting gives us LOTS of chances to try again.
Most
other aspects of Dr. Bryson’s talk were pretty much in line with what I teach
to parents and students, which of course feels great. (Honestly, no one likes a smug preschool teacher! But I can’t help feeling good about
being right sometimes.) However, it’s true confession time once again: I’ll admit that I was jealous of Dr.
Bryson’s ability to explain things in ways that are MUCH better than the
tongue-tied ways I often talk or write about these same topics. I just wish I were as articulate and
smart as she is! I think I’ll buy
her book and see if I can steal some of her ideas, and incorporate more of them
into my teaching.
For
more excellent information about the brain and emotional development in
childhood, look at Dr. Bryson’s website or buy her book, The Whole Brain Child.
-Connect
Before You Direct.
Dr.
Larry Cohen was a fabulous keynote speaker. He has some excellent ideas and a wonderful way of
explaining them. I completely
agree with his idea that guidance and discipline has to be based on a strong
and loving relationship between the adult and the child. I also agree that at most of the
moments in life when it’s necessary for some reason to “direct” or “correct” a
child, it’s best to take a few seconds to connect emotionally with them first. This makes everything work better for
everyone concerned, and helps the child to be more ready to learn.
-Beyond
“Use Your Words”.
One
of my “discomfort” moments came when Dr. Cohen discussed the old
preschool-teacher phrase, “Use Your Words.” “C’mon, give me a break!” he
said. “If they COULD have used
words, they WOULD have. And if
they didn’t, then simply telling them to do it isn’t going to help.” I’m sure that I’ve used that term more
times than I would want to admit, although I like to think that I understand
the need for a wide range of teaching strategies when it comes to helping
children learn socially appropriate behavior.
-Not
Puppies Or Pigeons.
Fortunately,
Dr. Cohen confirmed my belief in my own wisdom when he said that adults can’t
stand the idea of doing anything that looks like it’s rewarding bad behavior,
so we often refrain from giving children the attention they need when they need
it the most. “Kids aren’t trained
pigeons,” he said . I think I have used the word “puppies” in this context, but
he and I are definitely on the same page when it comes to the idea that human
development is MUCH more complex than cause/effect, or reward/punishment. When
training puppies or pigeons, you do have to think at a somewhat simplistic
level to understand the motivations of the animal. But with children,
individuals vary so widely from one another, and we have to take into account
so many other things such as temperament, ages and stages, prior experiences,
and family culture, that simplistic thinking doesn’t get us very far. Dr. Cohen
clarified this further by saying that giving the right kind of attention to an
upset child isn’t rewarding bad behavior, it’s solving the problem at its
source. I think this is brilliant, and will be quoting it often in
conversations with parents from now on.
-“Parents
don’t have to be on the same page, but they need to be in the same book.” Well said, Dr. Cohen!
Since I heard him say this last weekend, I’ve already stolen this astute
phrase as a way of talking about the differences of opinion or style that exist
within families. I’ve always knows that no two adults can be in complete
agreement about everything, and moms and dads need to be reassured that this is
ok. But experience has taught me
that there are a few areas that require some sort of consensus in order for
co-parenting to be successful. Dr.
Cohen’s simple sentence has given me a way to think about and talk about this
important topic with parents.
Dr.
Cohen has a lot more great ideas to share and some books that I’ll probably
want to read. Here’s his website:
Ok—that’s
all the True Confessions for now.
Now you know that “insecurity” and “need to be right” are two of my most
basic character flaws…… and if you know me at all, you’re probably aware of a
few more. I came home with many pages of notes from the conference last week,
and I appreciate the opportunity to share just a few of my insights with you.
Learning
is awesome, whether it’s easy or uncomfortable. Writing this has reminded me that some of the most important
learning happens when we challenge our own thinking and step out of our cozy
cocoon of familiar knowledge.